THE FALLACY OF GROUP SELECTION In evolutionary biology discussions of altruism

نویسنده

  • CHRISTOPHER BADCOCK
چکیده

tic, and itself as committed to freedom. This is paradoxical, because sociology has emphasized social conditioning in much the same way that academic psychology used to believe in behaviourist conditioning. Just as Pavlov’s dogs were individually conditioned to salivate at the sound of a bell, so sociologists have tended to teach that human beings are socially conditioned. One of the founders of modern sociology, Émile Durkheim (1857-1917), claimed that all ‘social facts’ had social causes irreducible to other factors. He even believed that suicide was a social fact and that social causes had a coercive effect on individual behaviour. Like the behaviourist psychologist who regarded the organism as a clean slate on which anything could be written by the appropriate conditioning, Durkheim saw the individual mind as an empty field until filled and given form by a ‘collective consciousness’. This came about through a process that today would be called socialization — the moulding of the individual by Society. The most extreme expression of this was ‘altruistic’ suicide, where individuals counted their own lives as nothing compared to that of the group on whose behalf they sacrificed themselves.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The group selection controversy.

Many thought Darwinian natural selection could not explain altruism. This error led Wynne-Edwards to explain sustainable exploitation in animals by selection against overexploiting groups. Williams riposted that selection among groups rarely overrides within-group selection. Hamilton showed that altruism can evolve through kin selection. How strongly does group selection influence evolution? Fo...

متن کامل

Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.

From an evolutionary perspective, social behaviours are those which have fitness consequences for both the individual that performs the behaviour, and another individual. Over the last 43 years, a huge theoretical and empirical literature has developed on this topic. However, progress is often hindered by poor communication between scientists, with different people using the same term to mean d...

متن کامل

Hawkish but helpful: When cultural group selection favors within-group aggression

The origin of cooperation is a central problem in evolutionary biology and social science. Cultural group selection and parochial altruism are popular but controversial evolutionary explanations for large-scale cooperation. Proponents of the cultural group selection hypothesis argue that the human tendency to conform—a consequence of our reliance on social learning— maintained sufficient betwee...

متن کامل

Can natural selection favour altruism between species?

Darwin suggested that the discovery of altruism between species would annihilate his theory of natural selection. However, it has not been formally shown whether between-species altruism can evolve by natural selection, or why this could never happen. Here, we develop a spatial population genetic model of two interacting species, showing that indiscriminate between species helping can be favour...

متن کامل

Altruism may arise from individual selection.

The fact that humans cooperate with non-kin in large groups, or with people they will never meet again, is a long-standing evolutionary puzzle. Altruism, the capacity to perform costly acts that confer benefits on others, is at the core of cooperative behavior. Behavioral experiments show that humans have a predisposition to cooperate with others and to punish non-cooperators at personal cost (...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001